UP MARKETS Review

Updated: May 24, 2026
UP MARKETS
Views6

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsFebruary 20260
March 20260
April 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About UP MARKETS

Up-Markets operates under the domain up‑markets.com and markets itself as a provider of retail forex trading and CFDs, including access to currency pairs, indices, and cryptocurrencies. No regulatory licenses or registration numbers are displayed on the website. Warnings have been issued by Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) on 26 February 2024 for offering investment services without authorization and by ASIC (Australia) on 5 February 2024, identifying the firm as unauthorised. The company is categorized as unregulated across major jurisdictions, and its website lacks disclosure of headquarters, client fund protection, regulatory compliance, or investor compensation schemes. According to WikiFX (updated 18 May 2026), account tiers include minimum deposits from $5,000 (Green account) up to $250,000 (Presidential account), maximum leverage up to 1:200, support for EAs and scalping, and spreads from approximately 2.5–3 pips. The overall risk score on WikiFX is 1.35 out of 10, indicating very high risk.

Who it’s for

  • None identified: absence of regulation, high-risk profile, and lack of disclosures make it unsuitable for any responsible investor.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Offers several account tiers with high minimum deposits that may appeal to high-net-worth individuals seeking tailored tiered structures (e.g., Green to Presidential).
  • Allows automated trading (EA) and scalping, and provides leverage up to 1:200.

Cons

  • No valid regulatory licenses; unauthorised by CNMV (warning dated 26 February 2024) and ASIC (warning dated 5 February 2024).
  • High minimum deposits (from $5,000) and opaque fee/spread structure (~2.5–3 pips), with no transparent pricing.
  • Extremely low trust score (1.35/10) on WikiFX, indicating very high operational risk and insufficient investor protection.
  • Lack of transparency regarding headquarters, legal entity, client fund segregation, KYC/AML compliance, and investor compensation.

Page loaded in 425.00 ms