PFH MARKETS Review

Updated: May 7, 2026
PFH MARKETS
Views673

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank13868177
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits1059
Bounce Rate0.3392
Pageviews per Visit1.29
Avg. Visit Duration11.95
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 2026766
February 20261192
March 20261059
Top countriesIndia (IN)56.85%
Pakistan (PK)43.15%
Traffic sourcesSearch41.08%
Direct37.86%
Referrals14.3%
Social3.79%
Paid Referrals1.97%
Mail0.25%
Top keywordsbest commoditis to trade in 2026 ◦ $140
криптовалюта торговля ◦ $120
cfd trading11370 ◦ $17.96 ◦ $10
pfh1970 ◦ $3.66 ◦ $0
ground floor, the sotheby building, rodney village, rodney bay, gros-islet, saint lucia720 ◦ $0

About PFH MARKETS

According to available regulatory records, no authorized financial regulator (including the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or NFA) lists PFH Markets or any entity operating via the domain pfhmarkets.com as a licensed investment or forex brokerage. The official website pfhmarkets.com presents no verifiable license number, regulator name, or corporate registration details. Public registries and warning lists from major authorities do not indicate that PFH Markets holds authorization for investment or CFD services under their supervision. FCA, Official site

The website offers access to trading services but does not disclose key financial conditions such as minimum deposit requirements, account types, fees, trading platforms, leverage limits, or base currencies. It also does not provide information concerning investor protection mechanisms (for example, negative balance protection or client fund segregation). In the absence of verifiable regulatory credentials, users cannot confirm whether PFH Markets follows any recognized standards for brokerage operations. ASIC, CySEC

Pros and cons

Cons

  • No verified license or regulatory authorization in any major jurisdiction.
  • Lack of publicly available details on trading conditions or client protection measures.
  • Unclear corporate structure and absence of contact transparency.

Page loaded in 420.00 ms