QuantumFX (General Branding) EN

FXCess Review

Updated: August 31, 2026
FXCess
Views1209

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank671549
Country CodeGB
Country Rank97299
Category Rank645
Engagement metricsVisits41442
Bounce Rate0.381
Pageviews per Visit3.73
Avg. Visit Duration109.84
Estimated monthly visitsMay 202654407
June 202660871
July 202641442
Top countriesFrance (FR)22.8%
Australia (AU)16.65%
Morocco (MA)11.13%
Italy (IT)10.57%
Spain (ES)7.37%
Traffic sourcesDirect59.51%
Referrals7.64%
Mail1.71%
Social-
Paid Referrals-
Search-
Top keywordsfxcess810 ◦ $1.78 ◦ $2860
fxcess demo unlimited demo110 ◦ $210
forex risk natural disasters200 ◦ $160
fxcess download90 ◦ $90
fxcess affiliate commission60 ◦ $60

About FXCess

FXCess operates under the trade name of Notesco Int Limited, registered in Anguilla with registration number A000001800, and also refers to Notesco Limited, incorporated in Bermuda with registration number 51491, offering services via the domain fxcess.com ().

The broker is not authorised by the Spanish regulator Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) to provide investment services; a public warning (CNMV Warning_FXCESS) was issued on 2 March 2026 stating that FXCess is not authorised to offer services related to foreign currency transactions or other financial instruments under Spanish law ().

The Anguilla Financial Services Commission has issued an investor alert dated 6 January 2025 declaring that Notesco Int Limited trading as FXCess is not licensed, nor has ever been licensed, to conduct financial services business in derivatives, CFDs, forex, precious metals, or any related instruments ().

Pros and cons

Pros

  • No verifiable regulatory authorization exists; multiple regulators have issued warnings and alerts.

Cons

  • Operating without regulation from Spanish CNMV and Anguilla FSC.
  • Domain fxcess.com flagged as fraudulent by independent analysis citing regulatory warning dated 2 March 2026 ().
  • Regulatory and user-review sources describe lack of oversight, withdrawal issues, and deceptive practices ().

Page loaded in 1824.00 ms