Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | September 2025 | 0 |
| October 2025 | 0 | |
| November 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About AITrader
AITrader operates via the domain aitrader.fm. It claims to be run by a UK‑based entity, “AITrader (UK) Ltd,” with an address at North London Business Park, Brunswick Park Rd, London N11 1GN (). The broker asserts authorization by an entity called “Financial Security Commission of Europe (FISEU)” under license number 723515 (). This claimed regulator does not exist; no licence is verifiable, and the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) does not list AITrader as authorised (). Multiple independent reviews confirm that AITrader is unregulated, lacks investor protections (like segregated accounts, compensation schemes, or negative balance protection), and is associated with high-risk or fraudulent activity ().
Trading conditions mentioned include high leverage up to 1:1000 and a suggested minimum deposit of USD 250, with spreads from 0.4 pips (). The broker appears to offer a web‑based trading platform only, with no transparent details on commissions, swaps, Islamic accounts, hedging, scalping, expert advisors, base currencies, or account types beyond general mentions ().
The platform’s trustworthiness is further questioned by its low trust score, anonymous WHOIS registration, hosting in high‑risk jurisdictions, and frequent association with scam reports ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- Claims competitive spreads (~0.4 pips) and high leverage (up to 1:1000) under high‑risk conditions ().
Cons
- No valid regulation; claims of licensing are false (FISEU does not exist; FCA does not authorize) ().
- No investor protection measures (no fund segregation, no compensation, no negative balance protection) ().
- Unverified company details, opaque ownership, and lack of legal documentation ().
- High operational and financial risk, with multiple scam alerts and very low trust indicators ().













