Wall Street Exchange Review
20
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | March 2026 | 0 |
| April 2026 | 0 | |
| May 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Wall Street Exchange
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a warning identifying “Wall Street Exchange / wallstreet‑fx.io” as an unauthorised firm. The notice states that this entity is not permitted to offer financial services and urges consumers to avoid it; neither the Financial Ombudsman Service nor the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) would be available to clients of this firm. The warning includes the firm’s address in Nicosia, Cyprus, and lists multiple contact details and domains: thewallstreetexchange.io and wallstreet‑fx.io.
Compliance checks found no record of licensing from key regulators such as the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), or U.S. authorities like the SEC or CFTC. This broker advertises high leverage (up to 1:500), a minimum deposit of £250, and a range of instruments including forex, crypto, indices, stocks, and commodities—but these claims are unsupported by any regulatory approval.
Independent safety and technical analyses assign the site a very low trust score, characterize it as high-risk or “likely scam,” and flag numerous red flags including opaque operations, hidden domain ownership, use of multiple confusing domains, aggressive account type promotions, unverifiable claims of long-term market presence, and lack of company transparency.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Advertised low minimum deposit (£250) and high leverage (up to 1:500), appealing to risk-tolerant traders.
Cons
- Unauthorised by the FCA; clients lack legal protection and compensation schemes. ()
- No record of regulation by any major financial authority (FCA, ASIC, CySEC, SEC/CFTC). ()
- Low trust scores and serious risk indicators, including lack of corporate transparency, potentially misleading marketing and domain obfuscation. (, )
