Union Wallet Review
4
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | February 2026 | 0 |
| March 2026 | 0 | |
| April 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Union Wallet
Union Wallet is not recognised or authorised by any financial regulator. It is included on the French regulator AMF’s blacklist under domain www.union-wallet.com, with a warning published on 17 June 2022 that it is not authorised to provide financial services in France (). Searches of official databases reveal no valid regulatory licences or registration numbers for Union Wallet across recognised authorities such as FCA, CySEC or ASIC ().
The broker’s website lacks any indication of trading conditions or infrastructure: there is no disclosed minimum deposit, no trading platforms identified (e.g., MT4/MT5), no details on spreads, leverage, account types, base currencies, swap‑free options, or policies on hedging, scalping, or expert advisors (). The absence of these basic operational facts prevents confirmation of any legitimate functionality.
Based on the available evidence, Union Wallet operates without regulatory oversight and provides no verified information about trading services, which indicates that client funds would not be protected under any established legal framework.
Pros and cons
Pros
- No factual evidence supports the presence of regulatory oversight or verified operations.
Cons
- No regulatory authorisation or licence is documented.
- Included on AMF’s blacklist as unauthorised in France.
- Essential information about trading conditions, platforms, account types, and safeguards is not publicly available.
