TradeZoom Review

Updated: May 14, 2026
TradeZoom
Views5

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsFebruary 20260
March 20260
April 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About TradeZoom

TradeZoom is not authorised by any recognised financial regulator. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a warning that “TradeZoom LTD / tradezoom.pro” is a clone of the FCA‑authorised firm Zoom Finance Limited (FRN 663760), stating that there is no connection between them; TradeZoom uses falsified details such as address, telephone number, email and firm reference numbers. Dealing with them means customers have no access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) if problems arise.

No valid regulation for TradeZoom has been identified. Claims of regulation by the non‑existent “Financial Control Bureau of Securities Markets” are not corroborated by any recognised authority and are therefore invalid.

The broker’s website tradezoom.pro has been reported as inaccessible offline. The site previously purported to offer three account types—Bronze ($250–$5,000), Silver ($5,000–$25,000), and Gold ($25,000–$100,000)—but provided no transparent details on platforms, asset classes, minimum spreads, leverage, commissions, withdrawal methods, or support for trading tools like EAs or swap‑free options.

Pros and cons

Cons

  • The broker is a clone firm, unauthorised by any recognised regulator, and subject to an FCA warning.
  • No regulatory protection (such as FSCS or Ombudsman) for clients.
  • Claims of regulation are fabricated, referencing a non‑existent authority.
  • Lack of transparency: critical details like platforms, spreads, leverage, commissions, and deposit/withdrawal mechanisms are not provided.
  • Website accessibility has been reported as offline, which is a significant operational red flag.

Page loaded in 402.00 ms