Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | February 2026 | 0 |
| March 2026 | 0 | |
| April 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About TradeLandFX
TradeLandFX operates with no regulatory authorization from recognized financial supervisory bodies. Investigations show no evidence of an active licence from the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) of South Africa, and indications suggest misuse of licence details belonging to another entity, rendering its regulatory claims invalid. TradeLandFX’s registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines offers no regulatory protection for clients' funds. Multiple sources describe the broker as unregulated and unsafe for investors.
TradeLandFX claims to offer six account types—from Nano (cent) to Pro—with minimum deposits starting at $10 for Nano and $100 for Standard accounts. It provides trading via MetaTrader 4 (MT4), with leverage up to 1:1000 and spreads from 0.2 pips. Available instruments include CFDs on forex pairs, cryptocurrencies, stocks, indices, metals, and commodities. Additional services advertised include MAM accounts, copy trading, negative balance protection, and 24/7 multilingual support through live chat, phone, and email.
Pros and cons
Pros
- MetaTrader 4 platform availability facilitates familiar trading environment.
- Low entry barrier with minimum deposit from $10 and high leverage up to 1:1000.
- Wide range of tradable instruments across multiple asset classes.
- Services like MAM accounts, copy trading, and negative balance protection are advertised.
Cons
- Lack of verifiable regulation; serious concerns about legitimacy and safety of funds.
- Regulatory claims appear to rely on credentials of a different, unrelated firm.
- Conflicting information about basic trading conditions, such as spreads, deposit amounts, and platform availability.
- Withdrawal and operational reliability are questioned; user feedback and specialist reviews raise doubts.















