QuantumFX (General Branding) EN

TradeFXP Review

Updated: September 12, 2026
TradeFXP
Views278

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank16125749
Country CodeIN
Country Rank1099545
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits1044
Bounce Rate0.3693
Pageviews per Visit1.02
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsMay 2026856
June 20261459
July 20261044
Top countriesIndia (IN)100%
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-
Top keywordsthe ten plagues of egypt and their significance320 ◦ $150
tradfxp30 ◦ $30
charles ponzi6200 ◦ $0.68 ◦ $0
black cube of saturn1600 ◦ $0
ahom kingdom1170 ◦ $0

About TradeFXP

TradeFxP Ltd is registered in Saint Lucia under registration number 2024‑001111 and lists operational offices in Dubai, UAE, and Saint Lucia, providing trading instruments including Forex, Spot Metals, Energies, Indices, Stocks/CFDs and Crypto via MetaTrader 4 on desktop, mobile and WebTerminal. The broker advertises minimum deposit of 10 USD, minimum lot size of 0.01 standard lots (1 000 units), leverage from 1:1 to 1:500, segregated client funds, negative balance protection, swap-free/Islamic accounts, and automated deposit/withdrawal processing up to USD 5 000 .

No valid regulatory license has been confirmed for TradeFxP. Searches of registries including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), UAE’s Central Bank (CBUAE) and Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) show no record of authorization; industry research sites also flag TradeFxP as unregulated and high-risk, with inconsistent claims regarding regulation and no evidence of legitimate oversight , , .

Conflicts exist in claims of regulation by IFMRRC, but this is not confirmed by any recognized regulator and appears inconsistent with official registry data and analysis from watchdog platforms

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Low minimum deposit (10 USD) and small minimum lot size (0.01 lot); MetaTrader 4 available across devices; offers swap-free/Islamic accounts; segregated funds and negative balance protection are claimed .

Cons

  • No evidence of regulation by FCA, DFSA, CBUAE or equivalent, placing client funds at significant risk; claims of IFMRRC licensing unverified; unregulated status confirmed by independent sources .

Page loaded in 1804.00 ms