TradeFXP Review

Updated: May 7, 2026
TradeFXP
Views3

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank11894319
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits1075
Bounce Rate0.462
Pageviews per Visit1.81
Avg. Visit Duration10.19
Estimated monthly visitsFebruary 20261746
March 20261450
April 20261075
Top countriesUnited States (US)52.49%
India (IN)47.51%
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-
Top keywordsisrael canal under development ◦ $100
saturn worship5690 ◦ $0
black cube of saturn2320 ◦ $0
black cube saturn860 ◦ $0
saturn cult690 ◦ $0

About TradeFXP

TradeFxP Ltd is registered in Saint Lucia under registration number 2024‑001111 and lists operational offices in Dubai, UAE, and Saint Lucia, providing trading instruments including Forex, Spot Metals, Energies, Indices, Stocks/CFDs and Crypto via MetaTrader 4 on desktop, mobile and WebTerminal. The broker advertises minimum deposit of 10 USD, minimum lot size of 0.01 standard lots (1 000 units), leverage from 1:1 to 1:500, segregated client funds, negative balance protection, swap-free/Islamic accounts, and automated deposit/withdrawal processing up to USD 5 000 .

No valid regulatory license has been confirmed for TradeFxP. Searches of registries including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), UAE’s Central Bank (CBUAE) and Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) show no record of authorization; industry research sites also flag TradeFxP as unregulated and high-risk, with inconsistent claims regarding regulation and no evidence of legitimate oversight , , .

Conflicts exist in claims of regulation by IFMRRC, but this is not confirmed by any recognized regulator and appears inconsistent with official registry data and analysis from watchdog platforms

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Low minimum deposit (10 USD) and small minimum lot size (0.01 lot); MetaTrader 4 available across devices; offers swap-free/Islamic accounts; segregated funds and negative balance protection are claimed .

Cons

  • No evidence of regulation by FCA, DFSA, CBUAE or equivalent, placing client funds at significant risk; claims of IFMRRC licensing unverified; unregulated status confirmed by independent sources .

Page loaded in 412.00 ms