Swiss Vests Review

Updated: April 26, 2026
Swiss Vests
Views1

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 20260
February 20260
March 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Swiss Vests

Swiss Vests operates as a brand under OnlineWindows LLC, registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as company number 2931 LLC 2023, offering Forex, CFDs, metals, indices, cryptocurrencies, energies, shares among over 350 assets via a proprietary web-based trading platform (). The broker offers five account tiers—Basic (leverage up to 1:20), Intermediate (1:40), Advanced (1:100), VIP (1:200) and Elite (1:400)—with corresponding Stop Out levels decreasing from 10% to 2% and varying numbers of monthly training sessions, though the minimum deposit amounts are unspecified and spreads are advertised "from 0 pips" without clarity on commissions or withdrawal/payment methods ().

Swiss Vests is not regulated by any recognized financial authority. The Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) of Belgium issued a warning on 16 May 2024 against Swiss‑Vests, stating that the company may be providing services without authorization in Belgium (). The Financial Services Authority of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG FSA) does not license forex or CFD brokerage activities, making the registration insufficient as regulatory protection (). Additional red flags include a low trust score from ScamAdviser and anonymity in domain registration, further undermining credibility ().

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Offers a variety of asset classes, including Forex, cryptocurrencies, metals, indices, energies, shares via web-based trading platform ().

Cons

  • Absence of licensure by any reputable regulator; SVG FSA does not authorize such services, and FSMA has issued an unauthorized services warning (16 May 2024) ().
  • Lack of transparency: no information on minimum deposit, payment methods, or withdrawal processing; platform details limited; spreads vague despite claims “from 0 pips” ().
  • High leverage up to 1:400 raises significant risk, exceeding regulatory caps in regions like EU/UK; no negative balance protection or segregated accounts ().
  • Low website trust score, hidden WHOIS data, and anonymized domain ownership suggest potential scam behavior ().

Page loaded in 455.00 ms