Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Success Vests
Success Vests operates via the domain successvests.com and is flagged as an unauthorized entity by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a warning dated February 5, 2024. The FCA indicates that Success Vests is not permitted to conduct regulated financial services in the UK.
No registration has been found with key regulators such as the UK’s FCA, the US National Futures Association (NFA) or Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), or the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). The broker presents certificates and claims of regulation under names like Success Vests Ltd and Lucro Finance Ltd, but these are not validated in any official registry.
Reported trading conditions include a minimum deposit of USD 200, leverage purported up to 500:1, cryptocurrency-only deposits and withdrawals, package-based account types (e.g., Beginner, Basic), and unsupported promises of daily return on investment (ROI). Spreads, commissions, and withdrawal terms are undisclosed or unspecified.
Pros and cons
Pros
- No confirmed advantage based on reliable data
Cons
- Unregulated and unauthorized—warned by FCA on February 5, 2024.
- False claims of regulation under Success Vests Ltd and Lucro Finance Ltd, not verifiable in official registries.
- No legitimate trading platforms disclosed; functionality appears misleading or non-existent.
- Offers speculative high daily ROI and referral bonuses—non-standard and high-risk.
- Accepts only cryptocurrencies—anonymity elevates risk and undermines transparency.















