Standex Capital Review

Updated: April 23, 2026
Standex Capital
Views5

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 20260
February 20260
March 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Standex Capital

Standex Capital operates via the domain standex.capital and claims to be established at “2 Av. Charles de Gaulle, 1653 Luxembourg”. The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) does not recognize this entity; it is not supervised, nor authorised to provide investment or financial services from Luxembourg .

No evidence exists of licences or regulation from recognized authorities such as the FCA (UK) or CSSF (Luxembourg), and the broker is absent from both regulatory registers ; sources confirm the absence of any valid regulation .

Available information indicates the following trading conditions: account tiers labeled Bronze to VIP, minimum deposit ranging from USD 5 000 to USD 250 000, maximum leverage up to 1:200, and an advertised EUR/USD spread of approximately 0.4 pips. However, details on commissions, swap-free/Islamic account options, base currencies, asset classes, supported platforms, negative balance protection, hedging/scalping policies, or MetaTrader availability remain unverified from primary sources ; .

Who it’s for

  • Not enough confirmed information exists to responsibly define a target audience.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • No verified advantages based on primary regulatory or institutional sources.

Cons

  • Unregulated by any recognised financial authority.
  • CSSF warning states that the entity is unknown and unauthorised .
  • High minimum deposit requirements (USD 5 000–250 000), which significantly exceed standard levels .
  • Lack of transparency on key trading features such as fees, platforms, currencies, and risk protections.
  • Potential risk of misleading identity or cloned entity, with reports of inconsistent naming (e.g., Inte.com) and mixed contact details .

Page loaded in 490.00 ms