Stam Capital Invest Review

Updated: April 23, 2026
Stam Capital Invest
Views3

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 20260
February 20260
March 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Stam Capital Invest

Stam Capital Invest is operated by Shenanigans Consulting Ltd., registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines under company number 26499 BC/21, but it holds no authorization to provide forex or investment services from any recognized regulator; the SVG Financial Services Authority does not license forex trading activities (). The Romania Financial Supervisory Authority issued a formal investor alert on 18 November 2022 stating that both Shenanigans Consulting Ltd and Stam Capital Invest are not authorized to provide investment services under Law no. 126/2018 (). The UK's Financial Conduct Authority designated Stam Capital Invest an unauthorized firm—warning that any financial services or products offered in the UK are not FCA-approved, leaving clients without access to protection through the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme ().

The broker offers a proprietary web-based trading platform only, without support for industry-standard platforms such as MT4 or MT5, and there is no evidence of segregated client accounts, negative balance protection, or compensation schemes (). A minimum deposit of $250 is required (); some sources report up to $500 depending on account type, with base currency being USD only (). Leverage may be offered up to 1:100 or 1:600 in some cases (). Trading scope includes CFDs on shares, cryptocurrencies, forex pairs, commodities, and indices ().

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Web-based trading platform accessible in multiple languages (English, Russian, Spanish, German) ().
  • Wide range of CFD instruments across asset classes ().

Cons

  • No regulatory authorization from top-tier bodies (FCA, ASIC, CySEC, etc.) ().
  • Formal warnings issued by regulators: Romania’s ASF (18 Nov 2022) and UK’s FCA (16 Feb 2023) ().
  • Absence of key client safeguards such as fund segregation, negative balance protection, or compensation schemes ().
  • Opaque withdrawal policies and history of user complaints regarding fund recovery and service conduct ().

Page loaded in 540.00 ms