Safity Review
6
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | January 2026 | 0 |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| March 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Safity
Safity operates via the domain safity.pro and additionally uses privat.bet. It claims affiliation with the Dutch AFM and Belgian FSMA regulators, but no valid license exists. The Belgian FSMA issued a public warning stating that Safity is providing financial services or products without authorisation. The warning includes both safity.pro and privat.bet as unauthorised platforms. Furthermore, Spain’s CNMV also lists safity.pro among firms warned as unauthorised entities. These actions plainly indicate that Safity is neither regulated nor authorised. ,
Safity does not hold any confirmed licenses, regulatory approvals, or legal documentation from recognised financial authorities. Its claims of regulation by the FSMA and AFM are false and contradicted by regulatory databases. The FSMA warning and absence of any AFM record leave no doubt that Safity operates without oversight.
Pros and cons
Pros
- No verifiable positive regulatory or operational facts available
Cons
- Unauthorised by FSMA, operating without licence
- Listed among unauthorised platforms by Spain’s CNMV
- False regulatory claims regarding FSMA and AFM
