Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Website: https://www.roitrader.uk/
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | January 2026 | 0 |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| March 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About ROIFX
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a warning on January 20, 2023 stating that ROIFX is not authorised to provide financial services in the United Kingdom and is targeting people in the UK. Associated websites include roifxtrader.com, roifxtrader.info, roitrader.me, roifx-trader.uk, and roitrader.uk ().
ROIFX operates only via its proprietary WebTrader platform with no support for MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or other established trading software (). The broker requires a minimum deposit of USD 5,000, offers leverage reportedly up to 1:600 across various account tiers (Standard to Platinum), and claims to offer forex, indices, commodities, shares, and cryptocurrencies ().
Who it’s for
- This broker presents itself to high-net-worth or institutional-like clients requiring high minimum deposits (starting at USD 5,000).
- It targets traders interested in a wide range of assets—forex, indices, commodities, equities, and cryptocurrencies—via a single WebTrader platform.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Offers access to multiple asset classes (FX pairs, indices, commodities, stocks, cryptocurrencies) via a unified WebTrader platform.
Cons
- Not regulated by any recognised financial authority; FCA explicitly warns that it is unauthorised to operate in the UK ().
- Operates only a proprietary WebTrader platform without support for industry-standard MT4/MT5 ().
- High minimum deposit requirements (USD 5,000 and upwards), potentially excluding retail traders ().
- Lack of evidence for segregated client accounts, compensation scheme coverage, or fund protection measures ().













