Robertson RX Review

Updated: April 14, 2026
Robertson RX
Views1

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 20260
February 20260
March 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Robertson RX

Robertson RX is not authorised by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to offer financial services or products in the UK; the FCA has issued a warning stating that Robertson RX is an unauthorised firm targeting UK consumers and that dealing with it means clients are not protected by the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.  ()

The broker lacks any valid regulatory licence from recognised authorities, including the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS): no registration for Robertson RX was found in the MAS registry. Claims of being based in Singapore are unverified and false.  ()

Robertson RX is an offshore broker with no guarantees such as segregated client accounts, guaranteed fund protection, or negative balance protection. The minimum deposit is cited as £5,000, maximum leverage up to 1:50, though spreads are undisclosed. Withdrawal terms include high fees and volume requirements (e.g., handling fees up to 20% and 1,000‑lot trading volume before withdrawal possible).  ()

Pros and cons

Pros

  • No factual pros can be listed based on verified regulatory or operational information.

Cons

  • Unregulated by any recognised financial authority (FCA, MAS, etc.) ()
  • Unverifiable headquarters claim in Singapore; no valid licence from MAS ()
  • High minimum deposit (£5,000) with opaque conditions on spreads, fees, and leverage ()
  • Reportedly imposes onerous withdrawal conditions, handling fees, and volume requirements ()

Page loaded in 499.00 ms