RKFS Review
3
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | 2873983 |
| Country Code | IN | |
| Country Rank | 209248 | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 7938 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.7829 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 1.35 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 12.69 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | January 2026 | 4727 |
| February 2026 | 3218 | |
| March 2026 | 7938 | |
| Top countries | India (IN) | 100% |
| Traffic sources | Search | 47.52% |
| Direct | 39.65% | |
| Referrals | 7.51% | |
| Social | 3.8% | |
| Paid Referrals | 1.47% | |
| 0.05% | ||
| Top keywords | rkfs | 150 ◦ $150 |
| nse f&o stocks list excel download | 80 ◦ $60 | |
| lock google sheet table | 200 ◦ $50 | |
| fno stock list download | 150 ◦ $50 | |
| download fno stock list | 160 ◦ $40 |
About RKFS
RKFS, operating via the domain rkfs.org, does not hold any licence or authorisation from recognised financial regulators; there is no record in registries of the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, NFA, or comparable authorities confirming regulatory approval. Multiple independent investigations explicitly classify RKFS as unregulated and potentially high‑risk, particularly in forex or derivative trading domains. The firm claims to provide services including securities, mutual funds, stocks, insurance, and consulting, and utilises trading platforms named Sanjhi Poonji available on web, Android, and iOS, but fails to disclose key trading conditions such as typical spreads, commissions, or swap rates. No minimum deposit requirement is stated. These factors raise significant concerns regarding transparency and investor protection.
Who it’s for
- Undetermined: No specific client segment can be responsibly identified due to the absence of verifiable regulatory or product-disclosure information.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Offers broad financial services including securities, mutual funds, insurance, and advisory services.
- Platform access is available via Sanjhi Poonji on web, Android, and iOS.
- No minimum deposit, potentially lowering the entry barrier for small investors.
Cons
- No valid regulatory licence from any recognised authority—firm is unregulated.
- Key trading conditions (spreads, commissions, swaps) are not disclosed, impeding cost transparency and risk assessment.
- Investor protection measures and fund security assurances are absent or unclear.
- Multiple warnings from independent reviewers label RKFS as suspicious or unsafe.
