Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | 3961872 |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 4112 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About ID MINING
ID Mining (operating via idmining.online) holds no licence from any recognised financial authority such as the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), ASIC, CySEC, or CFTC; Companies House incorporation under the name CLOUD TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, company number 09674619, does not equate to regulatory authorisation (). The platform presents itself as a cloud mining investment service offering high returns and various plans, but there is no regulatory oversight or protection for client funds ().
Multiple independent sources classify ID Mining/idmining.online as a likely scam: BrokersView labels it an “unregulated broker” and warns against entrusting funds; Scamwatcher documents complaints that mention blocked withdrawals, fake domains (e.g., idmining.vip, idmining.org), and deceptive tactics; domain records indicate a recent registration (2024‑08‑05) inconsistent with claims of years of operation (). Reports include aggressive upselling, commission demands before withdrawals, and account abandonment after deposits ().
Who it’s for
- Individuals seeking cloud mining schemes lacking transparency; the platform offers short‑term high‑ROI plans, but lacks regulatory and institutional credibility ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- Claims a variety of cloud mining investment options and referral incentives ().
Cons
- No regulation or licence from any financial authority; high risk with no investor protection ().
- Consistent user and watchdog reports of blocked withdrawals, hidden charges, and demand for new deposits to access funds ().
- Recent domain registration contradicts claims of long‑term operation; lack of contact or verifiable company information ().
- Multiple suspicious domains and reported censorship of negative customer feedback ().













