FXLINK Review

Updated: May 14, 2026
FXLINK
Views216

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank13154525
Country CodeVN
Country Rank352655
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits1333
Bounce Rate0.3864
Pageviews per Visit1.01
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJanuary 20260
February 2026151
March 20261333
Top countriesVietnam (VN)89.29%
United States (US)10.71%
Traffic sourcesSearch44.08%
Direct34.56%
Referrals12.57%
Social6.09%
Paid Referrals1.41%
Mail0.17%
Top keywordsmetatrade51580 ◦ $0
fxl420 ◦ $0
fxl portal300 ◦ $0
usd/jpy khác gì gbp/usd0 ◦ $0

About FXLINK

FXLINK, operating under the name FXLINK CORP LIMITED and reportedly registered in the United Kingdom with company number 12671959, offers trading services in forex, CFDs across various asset classes including metals, indices, US stocks, energies, and cryptocurrencies via the MetaTrader 5 platform. It advertises account types labelled “Basic,” “ECN,” and “Pro,” with minimum deposits ranging from $50 (Basic) to $200 (Pro), maximum leverage up to 1:500 or floating up to 1:5000, spreads from 0.0 pips, and no specified commissions or minimum deposit limit for ECN. ()

FXLINK is not regulated by any recognized financial authority. It displays claims of unauthorized status with the NFA (U.S. National Futures Association) and provides no valid license numbers; access checks confirm absence from FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or equivalent regulatory registers. ()

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Wide range of tradable instruments including forex, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies, US stocks, and energies. ()
  • Supports MetaTrader 5 platform, including full features and available demo account. ()
  • Low minimum deposit (from $50 for Basic accounts). ()

Cons

  • Entirely unregulated; claims of NFA or other license are unauthorized, with no oversight by FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or similar regulators. ()
  • High maximum leverage (up to 1:5000) far exceeds regulatory limits, raising substantial risk. ()
  • Registration in the UK appears nominal; absence of transparency regarding operational headquarters, fund handling, or segregated accounts. ()
  • Spreads and leverage details vary across different sources and may be misleading or inconsistent. ()

Page loaded in 406.00 ms