Audrn Financial Group Review
493
Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2026 | 0 |
| August 2026 | 0 | |
| September 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Audrn Financial Group
Audrn Financial Group Pty Ltd (ACN 602 539 462) was named as the 69th defendant in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v 24-U Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 321. On 21 March 2025, the Federal Court of Australia made final orders granting most of ASIC’s requested relief and ordered the winding up of the 95 defendant companies on just and equitable grounds. Audrn Financial Group was included among the companies subject to the proceedings, and Catherine Conneely and Thomas Birch of Cor Cordis were appointed as joint liquidators.
The Federal Court judgment records that Mario Enrique Soto Ruiz did not consent to act as, and was not appointed as, a director of Audrn Financial Group on 1 February 2023; the purported appointment was declared void and of no effect. ASIC stated that its proceedings concerned companies it believed were associated with online investment and romance-baiting scams involving purported foreign exchange, digital-asset or commodities trading platforms. The website listed for the brand is audrn.studiossolution.com.
