QuantumFX (General Branding) EN

AssetsPilot Review

Updated: October 15, 2026
AssetsPilot
Views503

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJuly 20260
August 20260
September 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About AssetsPilot

AssetsPilot’s website advertised access to forex, cryptocurrencies, shares, indices, marijuana-related assets, energies, metals, and other markets, with claims of more than 40,000 instruments. It stated that minimum funding started at $200 and presented plans requiring $200, $1,000, $10,000, or $50,000, with advertised 24-hour returns of 15%, 30%, 35%, and 45%, respectively, plus a 5% referral bonus.

The same website stated that AssetsPilot was regulated by the GSE in the United States and by the Financial Conduct Authority, but the page did not provide a license number for either claim. The Bank of Russia lists “AssetsPilot” under “Signs of illegal professional securities market participant,” with an entry date of 23.12.2024. The regulator’s notice names assetspilots.com; the website identified in the supplied record is assetspilot.com, which is a different domain spelling.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • The website advertised multiple asset categories, including forex, cryptocurrencies, shares, indices, energies, and metals.
  • The website stated that accounts could be opened with minimum funding of $200.

Cons

  • The Bank of Russia identified the AssetsPilot brand as showing signs of an illegal professional securities market participant.
  • The website advertised fixed 24-hour returns of up to 45% and referral bonuses, while providing no license number for its stated FCA or U.S. regulatory claims on the cited page.
  • The regulator’s warning names assetspilots.com, whereas the supplied website domain is assetspilot.com; the notice does not establish that these domains are the same operator.

Page loaded in 2039.00 ms