ASSESETISIM Review

Updated: March 27, 2026
ASSESETISIM
Views119

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsDecember 20250
January 20260
February 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About ASSESETISIM

FCA has issued a warning concerning ASSESETISIM, identifying it as an unauthorised firm believed to be providing or promoting financial services or products in the UK without proper authorisation. The firm’s details are listed on the FCA’s Warning List, including its name, address (Loke House, Blofields Loke, Aylsham, Norfolk, England, NR11 6ES), email, and website assesetisiminvest.com. Consumers dealing with this firm would not be eligible for protection under the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) ().

The FCA warning was first published on 22 May 2025 and updated on 23 May 2025, explicitly advising consumers to avoid engaging with ASSESETISIM due to lack of authorisation (). Additional review sources corroborate that ASSESETISIM is unregulated and potentially fraudulent, highlighting inconsistencies such as a claimed registration date in 2015, while the domain was only created in 2025 ().

Pros and cons

Cons

  • Firm is not authorised by any recognised financial regulator and has been publicly warned by the FCA ().
  • Domain age and claimed registration details are inconsistent, raising serious legitimacy concerns ().

Who it’s for

  • This firm should be avoided by all investors due to the absence of regulatory protection and high risk of fraud ().

Other key details such as regulation/licence numbers, asset classes, platforms, account types, minimum deposits, spreads or commissions, maximum leverage, base currencies, swap-free/Islamic status, hedging/scalping/EA rules, number of base points (NBP), and official domains are not available in verifiable sources and therefore are not included.

References:

Page loaded in 465.00 ms