Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | December 2025 | 0 |
| January 2026 | 0 | |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About ASSESETISIM
FCA has issued a warning concerning ASSESETISIM, identifying it as an unauthorised firm believed to be providing or promoting financial services or products in the UK without proper authorisation. The firm’s details are listed on the FCA’s Warning List, including its name, address (Loke House, Blofields Loke, Aylsham, Norfolk, England, NR11 6ES), email, and website assesetisiminvest.com. Consumers dealing with this firm would not be eligible for protection under the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) ().
The FCA warning was first published on 22 May 2025 and updated on 23 May 2025, explicitly advising consumers to avoid engaging with ASSESETISIM due to lack of authorisation (). Additional review sources corroborate that ASSESETISIM is unregulated and potentially fraudulent, highlighting inconsistencies such as a claimed registration date in 2015, while the domain was only created in 2025 ().
Pros and cons
Cons
- Firm is not authorised by any recognised financial regulator and has been publicly warned by the FCA ().
- Domain age and claimed registration details are inconsistent, raising serious legitimacy concerns ().
Who it’s for
- This firm should be avoided by all investors due to the absence of regulatory protection and high risk of fraud ().
Other key details such as regulation/licence numbers, asset classes, platforms, account types, minimum deposits, spreads or commissions, maximum leverage, base currencies, swap-free/Islamic status, hedging/scalping/EA rules, number of base points (NBP), and official domains are not available in verifiable sources and therefore are not included.
References:













