Quant Tekel (QT) customer reviews

Reviews

My payout was originally scheduled for 25 December. It was delayed by 2 weeks without my consent. I submitted my payout request on 9 January. I was repeatedly told “24 business hours” and “by end of day” — but no payout was processed, even after several days. After I made around $6,000 profit on a $100k Instant account, my payout was suddenly rejected with the excuse of “one-sided betting”, despite: • Every trade having SL & TP • No martingale, no grid, no loss-chasing • Risk always within limits • Same trading behavior previously accepted When I challenged this calmly and with facts, they: • Closed my chat • Banned me from their Discord • Refused further discussion My conclusion from direct experience: • While you’re losing → no problem • When you become profitable → payouts get delayed • If profit is “too high” → they find a rule to deny payout This is not fair risk control — it’s profit-based payout denial. I strongly warn traders: think twice before buying accounts from this company.

QT IS A BIG SCAMMERS. After I pass the target on mY 50,000 account. Then I request my first pay out. But unfortunately. They are saying that I break the rules. There rules that never mention before. Only come out after you request your pay out. I warning every one don't ever try to buy their product. Otherwise you lose your money time and effort. Don't ever try to deal with this Un trusted prop firm QT funded. They have hidden rules that place only during Pay out request. They doest have plan to pay out your hard eran money. They waste your money time and effort. Better to join with FTMO or Funded Next.

Brahim helped me soo well shot out him

Whoever is in charge of QT FUNDED Instagram account is very helpful and provider , I had a few concerns about funding accounts and he or she was very professional with providing the right clarifications

I am very sad and disappointed to be writing such a review for QT. My journey with them was long before QT and I have received only 1 payout of $1.6k in April 2025. Fast forward to October 2025. A 5k payout was rejected - I initially had to sit a risk interview which I passed but then a week went by and they alleged I was part of group trading and never sent any proof. I had a review and zoom call with the Manager of Risk Mark and he offered me to either quit QT and get the payout (never use the services again) or keep trading Out of respect and the want for a long term relationship I chose the later but I deeply regret it In December they started an instant account promo to get an account and be eligible for payouts for Christmas. However a day before payout they moved everyone’s payouts by 14 days. I was able to request my payout a couple days ago and I got an email saying my device has been flagged for account management. They sent a fake screenshot of account login from Mumbai India, but I’m based in Sydney Australia. The risk team is not even open to listening. I sent them all the relevant proof but they terminated the live chat and closed my account and discord access. If you are not an influencer please avoid this firm as you are better of lighting your money one fire

Excellent support and fast resolution. I had an issue with my promo account, and the Quant Prop Firm support team addressed it almost immediately. The response was clear, professional, and efficient. I really appreciate how quickly they handled the situation. Highly recommended for anyone looking for a reliable prop firm with strong customer support.
I am extremely disappointed that this company has defrauded many traders and withheld their money. Meanwhile, they are still able to build a good review history to continue their fraudulent activities.

I’m sharing this review with the hope that QT will re-review my account in full context, not as a final complaint. Account ID: 10388560 I spent nearly 2 months, placed hundreds of trades, maintained strict risk management (generally 0.5–1.5% risk, well below the 4% daily limit), and successfully passed both Phase 1 and Phase 2 with discipline and consistency. The concern relates to a single incident on USDCHF: • I had SELL positions (10 lots × 3) opened and held normally as part of my strategy. • While manually managing multiple accounts, I accidentally opened an opposite position on another account. • I immediately realized the error and closed the opposite trade within 8- 10 seconds immediately , at a loss. • The original positions were held as planned. • The timestamps clearly show this was a human execution mistake, not hedging or reverse trading. I communicated openly with the support team, and they acknowledged that the mistake was genuine and corrected immediately. However, the decision to deny the live funded account was still marked as final. I fully respect QT’s rules. At the same time, I sincerely request that QT reconsider this decision by reviewing my entire trading history, intent, and consistency — rather than one brief execution error that was corrected instantly. On a positive note: • QT offers competitive spreads • The Discord community and support responsiveness are good • The trading environment itself is solid I’m leaving this review in good faith, hoping it leads to a fair reassessment of my account rather than closing the matter permanently.

I purchased a QT Power evaluation based on the rules shown on the main account selection page. When you hover over the daily drawdown limit (4%), the website tooltip states: “Maximum allowed loss of 4% measured at end-of-day compared to previous day’s closing equity. Different from intraday calculations.” That wording clearly communicates an end-of-day measurement, not an intraday “touch it anytime and you fail” rule. After a drawdown event, support told me the opposite: that if you hit 4% at any time during the day, it is an automatic breach. When I questioned the contradiction, I was directed to other locations on their website and community resources (FAQ/other pages/Discord) with different wording. In my opinion, the rules should be consistent and clearly defined in the same place where you buy the account. You should not have to hunt through multiple pages to find stricter language that contradicts what is shown on the purchase screen. This felt misleading and caused an unnecessary breach risk. QT Funded should fix this by making the “daily drawdown” definition consistent everywhere and clearly stating whether it is end-of-day only or intraday at all times.
The risk team that goes trough payout request is ass. They rejected a payout because they mean that I reverse traded. Something I dident do. So it’s clear that no one on the team is a real trader.

A year ago they are legend but now only trying to scom people this will be go loing time they will be get zero points on trustpilot

QT Funded DENIED my $7000AUD payout on account #1744655 and BREACHED my account after WRONGFULLY accusing me of reverse trading. I was accused of reverse trading despite the circumstances being impossible for me to do so. I entered a BUY position on US30 at 15:25:38PM and closed it the next day at 14:30:16PM However within that time period, a SELL position shows up at 15:25:50PM that apparently lasted 4 seconds. With this, they accuse me of reverse trading, however I was already in a BUY position making it impossible for me to enter a SELL position after on the SAME ASSET and SAME ACCOUNT. Its literally impossible. If i had entered a SELL position, it wouldve either taken size off my position or closed my BUY position and entered me into a SELL position. However I remained in my BUY position and closed it the next day. Support will not even co operate on this matter and just say the decision is final. In this circumstance it is literally IMPOSSIBLE for me to have entered a SELL while already being in a BUY. Absolutely disgraceful, denied my first payout due to complete stubbornness from QT Funded. UPDATE FOLLOWING QT FUNDED RESPONSE: Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, this response confirms the core issue rather than resolving it. You state that any opposing-direction log entry, regardless of duration, intent, or effect on exposure, is classified as reverse trading — even if it is system-triggered, a reconciliation artifact, or an execution anomaly. This is precisely the problem. TradeLocker operates on a netting system. In such a system, a genuine SELL entry on the same instrument must result in a reduction, closure, or flip of the existing BUY position. In my case, the BUY position remained continuously open and unchanged for over 23 hours. Net exposure never reversed, even momentarily. Classifying a 4-second server log entry with: • no TP • no SL • no exposure change • no position reduction as “reverse trading” stretches the definition beyond any practical or technical meaning. By your own admission, system-generated or anomalous events — not initiated by the trader and producing no opposing exposure — are still treated as trader breaches. That standard makes it impossible for traders to comply, as they cannot control or even see server-side artifacts that do not affect their position. This is not rule enforcement — it is rule misapplication. I am not disputing that your system recorded an event. I am disputing the interpretation of that event as intentional reverse trading when no hedging, no overlap of exposure, and no risk neutralization ever occurred. This review remains to document that my payout was denied based on a technical impossibility under netting mechanics, not on an actual trading strategy violation.
To start with quant tekel and it's team are group of incompetence. Secondly their objectives is to defraud vulnerable traders which am one of them. You don't award certificates and congratulations massages and allow traders to proceed from one phase to another and later on you find fluency excuses to ask them to start from phase one again what type of rubbish is that you want someone to be suffering from your incompetency. Most of your data shown for breached or payment denied is neither clear readable or understandable. Acct numbers # 10363476,10390751 and 10375754. This company needs to be reported to Action fraud for proper investigation. If you have enough money and time to waste you can patronise them otherwise stay away irrespective of their promotions buy one get 2 free.

wrost prop firm don't buy this firm account they are scammers they breached my account without breaking rules they say I hit my daily drawdown but I lost only 130$ and my drawdown limit was 200$ how they breached my account I don't break martingale or any other rule and they breached my account my account no is 10393996

My experience with this firm is neither completely bad nor good, but it has been extremely frustrating due to multiple issues. First, my payout date was shifted from 23-12-2025 to 05-01-2026 without proper prior clarity. When I contacted the co-founder on Discord, I was informed that a promised free Ultra account would be issued automatically after the payout. However, when I later contacted the risk team, they completely denied this and claimed that the offer only applies to traders whose payout date was shifted again due to a system glitch. This directly contradicts what was communicated earlier and reflects poor internal coordination and transparency. Second, the firm has no news trading rule, which in itself is acceptable. However, the way this rule is enforced is extremely unfair. There is no warning, no soft breach, and no prior notification. Instead, on the payout day, traders receive an email from the risk team stating that the account has been hard breached, resulting in a complete loss of the account rather than a reset. After putting in genuine effort and discipline, losing an account without any warning is deeply disappointing. Overall, the firm needs to significantly improve its communication, consistency, and trader protection. Clear warnings and transparent rule enforcement are the bare minimum expected from a professional prop firm.
Do not waste your time or money here. I turned a small account into a $307 profit with professional 0.5% risk management and a 22% consistency score, proving I am a disciplined trader. However, the moment I requested a payout, they went searching for a reason to deny it. They terminated my account and seized my profits over a single, isolated instance where a Buy and a Sell on Gold overlapped for a few minutes. This wasn't a 'strategy' or a pattern—it was a one-off manual execution error during high volatility. A legitimate firm would see my overall consistency and ignore a single timestamp overlap. Instead, Quant Tekel proved they are just looking for 'gotcha' moments to keep the money you worked hard for. They ignore your professional history just to avoid paying out. Highly recommended to stay away if you actually plan on getting paid
Too much spreed, high commission

DON'T EVER GO FOR THIS PROP FIRM. WORST EXPERIENCE EVER. HONEST REVIEW FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. They give offers just to get you to buy their challenges and will never pay. I had two instant funded accounts with them (25K and 50K) and I completed both challenges with 5% profit with a consistency score less than 25%. I was suuposed to get my payout on 26th December, then they said all the payouts are extended by another two weeks and then I requested my payout from the 50k account($2500), they rejected that payout saying that I have used prohibited strategies, which I have never ever used. In the email, they also mentioned that they will be revoking my access to the other 25K account I have but I am still able to trade on that account. They will let you trade until you request a payout and then reject it. The payout date for my 25K (extended) is 20th Jan. I have 6% profit in that account with a consistency score of 20% which is well within their limit, and I am pretty damn sure by now that they are going to reject that payout as well. I dare the owners to prove me wrong!

Absolutely scam website, bought 10k challenge 55% off buy one get another free over a month ago. They never provided me with login credentials. Reached out to their support team on 3 occasion. No response. Avoid at all cost!!!

The firm acknowledged via a mass email to existing users that there was an internal error in payout cycle calculations, resulting in payout dates being automatically extended. However, this communication was limited to a closed, non-public channel, and no transparent explanation or response was provided on any public-facing platform for potential users. What is particularly concerning is that reviews publicly mentioning payout delays are selectively reported and removed, even when the issue has already been acknowledged by the firm and evidence is provided. Meanwhile, negative reviews unrelated to payouts — including some without supporting evidence — remain visible. This inconsistent enforcement raises serious concerns about the integrity of the reporting process. When a company acknowledges a systemic payout issue privately while suppressing public discussion of it, it undermines transparency and trust. Documentation can be provided upon request.

Been trading with these Propfirm for a bit now and honestly, it’s been great. Platform runs smooth, conditions are decent (spreads are tight enough, execution is fast, no weird glitches), support actually replies fast and helps for real. The community’s pretty active too, feels like they’re not just treating us like numbers. I’ve got two 25k Prime accounts and one 5k Prime with them. My payout on the December 22 but they pushed it to the January 16th because of some dashboard update. Not gonna lie, it’s annoying, but this isn’t the first time they’ve done an update like this — last time they just added 1% extra to make up for it, and everything went fine. This time they hooked me up with three extra 5k Ultra accounts as compensation (one for each payout I had delayed). Pretty generous move tbh, Ultra ones have better stuff anyway. Big thanks to Thomas in support too — dude was super helpful and actually got the compensation accounts sorted for me quick. Shoutout to him! Pretty sure the payout on the January 16th will go through no problem. I’ll jump back on here after and let you know how it actually went. Overall? If you want a firm that’s got good conditions + support that doesn’t ghost you + actually tries to make things right when stuff happens… these guys are worth it. 5 stars from me so far. Fingers crossed for the January 16th!

December 18 I'm request payout after 20 days received schedule interview for January 7 I'm attend that interview after that interview im waiting for payout approved not received for 3 days but today today received for schedule for brief interview reschedule for Monday and Friday interview already 22 days is gone for no trading days after provisional Attend interview for another members also received reschedule interview that firm searching for rejected payout reasons Please don't buy QT FUNDED for cheap price and same time QT FUNDED paying for small amount for below 1k usd definitely pay for it but after that don't same people pay for it . Long time take for payout process please avoid it don't waste your times for that firm after hard work for its don't pay immediately Wait long time improve payout process and interview

My experience with Quant Tekal has been extremely frustrating and deeply concerning. They accused my account of “news trading” and “exposure breach” even though I did NOT trade during news releases. My trades were managed properly, stayed within control, and never hit drawdown. Yet once the account started performing in profit, sudden violations appeared. Even worse, some of the actions they flagged were system-triggered executions, not manual trades. Instead of taking responsibility for platform behavior, they chose to blame the trader. This does not feel like fair risk management. It feels like rules are used after the fact to deny profitable traders. Traders deserve transparency and honesty. Unfortunately, that is not what I experienced here Account number: 10350757

Just stay away from this scam firm, they will do anything to not give you your hard earned account, made me waste 3 months of hard work and money
great service from Brahim, explained everything timely will make purchase

My experience was good
⭐ 1-Star Review – QT Funded / Quant Tekel Payout denied based on unclear and inconsistently defined rules I am posting this to document my experience with QT Funded and to warn other traders. I requested a payout on account 10333711 after meeting the profit requirements. The payout was denied for alleged “reverse trading”. The core issue is that QT themselves never clearly defined what reverse trading actually is, and different QT representatives have provided conflicting explanations. Key points: • Reverse trading is not clearly defined in QT Instant rules. There is no explicit rule stating that any momentary overlap, including during trade closure, constitutes reverse trading. • QT staff provided different definitions. In QT’s own Discord, a QT representative publicly stated that reverse trading means opening a BUY on one account and a SELL on another at the same time. Later, Risk claimed that any overlap whatsoever, even during trade closure, is reverse trading — a materially different interpretation that was never clearly disclosed beforehand. • The account used to deny my payout was breached weeks earlier. The referenced comparison account was breached on 11 December 2025. All profits used for the payout were generated from 01 January 2026 onward, meaning there was no possible hedging, risk offset, or benefit. • Trades were discretionary, not hedging. A SELL was already running on the payout account. BUYS were taken later on a different account from a valid buy zone. Once reversal was confirmed, the SELL was closed early near target. TP and SL were set. There was no intent to hedge or neutralise risk. • Escalation attempts were blocked. After multiple attempts to resolve this privately, I raised the issue publicly and was timed out on Discord. Emails to support/legal were non-functional, leaving no clear escalation path. I am not disputing QT’s right to have rules. I am disputing the lack of clarity, inconsistent explanations, and retroactive interpretation of an undefined rule to deny an earned payout. Traders deserve clear definitions, consistent enforcement, and transparent dispute resolution.
The QT team has only provided generic, scripted responses referring to standard policies, without actually reviewing the issue on my individual account limits or live conditions. This does not resolve the concern. I request a proper, account-specific check instead of standard replies. If required, I can share live screenshots of the spreads for verification.

I became so frustrated by receiving no response at all from the support team that I intentionally violated the account, and I have decided that I will never take an evaluation from this company again.

I made 4000$ profit but they didn't pay me , they just paying small profits to get reviews. Totally scams. not recommended
