Phillip Securities Review
8
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | 4777626 |
| Country Code | SG | |
| Country Rank | 63780 | |
| Category Rank | 1477 | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 3248 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.3115 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 1.78 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 81.65 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | December 2025 | 3375 |
| January 2026 | 3952 | |
| February 2026 | 3248 | |
| Top countries | Singapore (SG) | 62.33% |
| Malaysia (MY) | 37.67% | |
| Traffic sources | Direct | 45.15% |
| Search | 40.88% | |
| Referrals | 10.27% | |
| Social | 2.83% | |
| Paid Referrals | 0.79% | |
| 0.07% | ||
| Top keywords | cfd | 93680 ◦ $4.31 ◦ $130 |
| poems metatrader 5 platform login | 100 ◦ $100 | |
| phillip cfd | 130 ◦ $60 | |
| cfd trading | 11380 ◦ $12.68 ◦ $10 | |
| poems 2.0 | 1040 ◦ $10 |
About Phillip Securities
Phillip Securities Pte Ltd, operating under the domain phillipcfd.com, offers trading in CFDs across various asset classes including equities, indices, commodities, and forex, as well as providing access via the MetaTrader 5 platform and POEMS trading environment, with over 5,000 CFD contracts across eight markets (). It requires prospective CFD traders to complete a Customer Knowledge Assessment (CKA) and acknowledge a Risk Fact Sheet as mandated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) ().
No regulatory licence from MAS, FCA, ASIC, or other recognised financial regulators is documented for Phillip Securities Pte Ltd. Investigations suggest that the firm may be misusing regulatory credentials from the compliant entity registered at phillip.com.sg, and does not appear on any official MAS registry under its operational domain, indicating impersonation concerns ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- Offers a breadth of CFD instruments across multiple asset classes including equities, indices, commodities, and forex ().
- Supports MetaTrader 5 and POEMS platforms, along with both demo and live accounts ().
- No minimum deposit requirement is noted ().
Cons
- Completely lacks regulatory authorisation; no licence from MAS, FCA, ASIC, or any other known regulator ().
- Evidence suggests potential impersonation of a regulated entity, raising concerns about legitimacy and investor safety ().
- Absence of investor protections such as segregated accounts or compensation schemes; regulatory oversight is absent ().
