Oaklands HOLDINGS LIMITED Review

Updated: March 21, 2026
Oaklands HOLDINGS LIMITED
Views25

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsJuly 20250
August 20250
September 20250
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Oaklands HOLDINGS LIMITED

Oaklands HOLDINGS LIMITED is not regulated by any recognized financial authority. The New Zealand Financial Markets Authority (NZ FMA) issued a warning on 16 November 2022 advising caution when dealing with the broker website oaklandholdingltd.net, noting that the entity is not registered to provide financial services in New Zealand and is misusing the name and address of an unrelated legitimate New Zealand company; the director of the legitimate company has confirmed no association with the entity ().

The firm operates the website oaklandholdingltd.net, registered on 4 September 2022 via Hostinger with privacy-protected ownership details (). The site promotes investment plans offering high daily returns (e.g., 2% daily for seven days with a minimum deposit of USD 100, and 5% daily for 30 days for deposits starting at USD 30,000), along with various referral and “Regional Representative” incentives including speculative non-financial benefits like free housing, vehicles, or education (). No regulatory licenses, trading platforms, asset classes, account types, commission structures, leverage, or other bona fide broker services are disclosed on the site.

Pros and cons

Cons

  • Unregulated; regulatory warning issued by NZ FMA with explicit denial of association by the legitimate company director ().
  • Website lacks transparency on core trading details (platforms, asset classes, account types, spreads, leverage, etc.) and promises implausible high returns with non-transparent referral schemes ().
  • Domain ownership concealed; site heavily reliant on marketing incentives and unrealistic benefits, rather than verifiable financial services ().

Pros

  • None verifiable from official documentation or regulatory sources.

Page loaded in 466.00 ms