Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Northstarvc
NorthStarVC, operating via the domain northstarvc.io (and reportedly also cfd.northstarvc.cc), does not hold any license from recognized financial regulators such as the FCA, CySEC, ASIC, SEC or CFTC; client funds are therefore not protected by any formal oversight or compensation scheme (). The British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) issued a warning on November 19, 2024, stating that NorthStarVC is not registered to trade or provide financial advice in British Columbia (). Additionally, the Autorité des marchés financiers (Quebec) included NorthStarVC (via northstarvc.io) on its blacklist, confirming that the entity is unregistered and unauthorized to solicit investors in Quebec, as of January 31, 2025 ().
Reports indicate frequent withdrawal issues, including delayed processing, failures to release funds, and unresponsive customer support (). The operation displays marketing tactics characteristic of fraudulent platforms: anonymous ownership, vague legal documentation, promises of high returns with low risk, aggressive deposit demands, and unverifiable testimonials (). Web trust evaluators assign a poor trust score to the domain; ScamAdviser notes hidden ownership, limited visitor traffic, and high risk factors associated with cryptocurrency services (), while sites like ScamDoc suggest similar concerns ().
Pros and cons
Cons
- No regulatory authorization or license from major financial authorities.
- Warnings issued by BCSC (Nov 19, 2024) and AMF Quebec (Jan 31, 2025).
- Anonymous ownership and lack of transparency in operations.
- Repeated reports of withdrawal repression and unresponsive support.
- Website evaluated as high-risk with poor trust scores from multiple analysis tools.
Pros













