Metro Chain Finance Review
4
Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | December 2025 | 0 |
| January 2026 | 0 | |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Metro Chain Finance
Metro Chain Finance, operating via the domain metrochainfinance.com, holds no licenses or authorizations from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or Spain’s Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) to provide investment or crypto‑asset services. The FCA has added the entity to its blacklist on account of being unregistered or unlicensed to offer such services (). The CNMV issued a public warning on February 16, 2026, stating that Metro Chain Finance is not authorized to provide investment services under Spain’s Securities Markets and Investment Services Act, nor to offer crypto‑asset services under EU Regulation 2023/1114 ().
Multiple independent safety and trust‑score assessments reflect extremely low credibility for the platform. ScamAdviser assigns a very low trust rating, flagging the site for high‑risk cryptocurrency services and limited visitor traffic (). Scam Detector’s validator gives the platform a score of 25 with tags such as “Suspicious”, “Unsafe”, and “Doubtful” (); Scamminder rates it at 10/100, citing multiple red flags including vague business model, lack of regulation, unrealistic promises, and ambiguous contact information ().
Customer reviews on Trustpilot reveal recurring complaints about non‑payments and withdrawal issues. Several users report being unable to withdraw funds or that the platform ceased responding altogether (). Risk‑warning sites such as TraceFrauds reinforce the absence of any regulatory oversight by recognized bodies (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC, SEC), and warn about the risks of unregulated entities safeguarding client funds (). WikiFX similarly notes no valid regulatory information, a minimum deposit of USD 100,000 for its “Business”, “Advanced”, “Standard”, and “Beginner” account types, but no further details on spreads or leverage ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- None confirmed through authoritative sources.
Cons
- No regulatory authorization from FCA or CNMV; officially blacklisted or warned ().
- Extremely low trust score from website‑safety assessments (ScamAdviser, Scam Detector, Scamminder) ().
- Numerous user complaints regarding inability to withdraw funds ().
- Lack of transparency concerning trading terms (e.g., spreads, commissions), corporate structure, or investor protections ().
