Metrictradingfx Review
45
Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Metrictradingfx
MetrictradingFX, operating under the company name P240 Ltd and domain metrictradingfx.com, has no registration with or authorization from any recognized financial regulator. It falsely claims a license from a non-existent “US Financial Services Authority” and cites a Maltese MFSA license number “IS/560000”, yet both claims are unverified; P240 Ltd and MetrictradingFX are absent from the Maltese Financial Services Authority registry. Regulatory authorities in the United States (CFTC, NFA) similarly list no record of this broker. The broker has also been the subject of a warning from the MFSA, identifying it as an unauthorized entity.
Reported trading terms include a minimum deposit of USD 500 and leverage up to 1:200. The broker promotes MetaTrader 5 (MT5) as its platform but fails to provide download links or account credentials. Practically, users experience redirection errors when attempting account creation or login. There is no evidence of segregated client funds, negative balance protection, or compliance with KYC/AML protocols. Clients report significant issues with withdrawal requests, including denials or complete non-responsiveness from customer support.
Who it’s for
- Not suitable for retail or professional traders due to lack of regulatory oversight
- Individuals seeking safe and transparent forex/CFD trading environments should avoid this broker
Pros and cons
Pros
- None—the broker lacks verified regulation, transparency, and basic protections.
Cons
- No legitimate regulatory licensing; claims to hold “US Financial Services Authority” license and MFSA number are unfounded and unverified.
- Subject of a regulatory warning by the MFSA; unauthorized operations.
- Opaque trading conditions: minimum deposit USD 500, high leverage (1:200), yet no platform access or functioning account registration.
- Reported problems with withdrawals and customer support non-responsiveness.
- No evidence of standard financial safeguards (segregated accounts, negative balance protection, KYC/AML).
