Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Megafxswifttrade
Megafxswifttrade is identified by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as an unauthorised firm that may be providing or promoting financial services or products in the UK without proper permission. It is listed in the FCA Warning List under the name “MEGAFXSWIFTTRADE” with the address “3238 Doctors Drive, Los Angeles, CA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 90017” and website “www.megafxswifttrade.com” ().
No evidence of regulation, licences, or authorisation by any recognised financial regulator is found for Megafxswifttrade. Reviews indicate the absence of guarantees such as fund segregation, negative balance protection, or compensation schemes, and note that it accepts cryptocurrencies only, has anonymous ownership, and offers minimal transparency on trading conditions. Claims include a minimum deposit of USD 100 and multiple account plans ranging from USD 100 to USD 10,000 ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- No substantiated facts indicating any legitimate benefits.
Cons
- Unauthorised by the FCA, with an explicit warning advising avoidance of the firm ().
- No regulation or licences verifiable through official sources.
- Anonymous ownership, likely false company details (e.g., the Los Angeles address is flagged as potentially fake) ().
- Absence of investor protections: no segregated accounts, no compensation scheme, no negative balance protection ().
- Lack of transparency in trading conditions—spreads, leverage, platform—are unspecified or absent ().
- Operations appear anonymous and high-risk, with multiple reviewers classifying the broker as a scam or untrustworthy ().













