Leading Alliance Review
64
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Leading Alliance
Leading Alliance operates under the name Leading Alliance Holding Limited, registered in the United Kingdom with company number 12836017, but lacks regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA); registration at Companies House does not confer financial oversight . The firm is not listed in the FCA register, and no valid licenses from FCA, NFA/CFTC, ASIC, or other recognized authorities are held ; , .
The broker offers trading via the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platform, providing access to instruments including forex, commodities, indices, and CFDs. Maximum leverage is stated as 400:1, with spreads advertised from 0.0 pips; some sources cite a minimum deposit requirement of USD 1 000 , , . No information is available on base currencies, Islamic accounts, negative balance protection, hedging, scalping, EAs, or swap-free terms.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Provides access to MetaTrader 5 platform.
- Offers instruments across forex, commodities, indices, and CFDs.
- Advertised leverage up to 400:1 and spreads from 0.0 pips.
Cons
- Completely unregulated; no valid license from any financial authority.
- Registered as a UK company but without FCA authorization.
- High minimum deposit (USD 1 000) compared to typical industry norms.
- Lack of transparency regarding account types, fees, client protection, deposit/withdrawal methods, and platform policies.
- Numerous independent reports classify the broker as high-risk or potential scam; users report withdrawal difficulties and absence of fund safeguards , .
