Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About KYOLO MARKETS
Kyolo Markets Limited is not registered with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; there is no record of its license or registration on the ASIC public register (). The broker does not disclose any valid regulatory oversight and is categorized by multiple independent sources as unregulated and high-risk ().
The trading conditions are severely lacking in transparency: the minimum deposit is not specified, spreads are not published, and leverage is stated as up to 500:1 without breakdown by asset class (). Some sources claim the broker offers trading in forex, commodities, stocks, and metals, though precise asset lists and platform details are inconsistent or unclear ().
Kyolo Markets Limited fails to provide standard safety features such as segregated client accounts, negative balance protection, or investor compensation schemes (). The broker’s website lacks transparency—no clear contact information, physical address, or corporate background is available ().
Who it’s for
- None—there is insufficient reliable information to identify a legitimate target audience; the lack of regulation and transparency precludes responsible recommendation.
Pros and cons
Pros
- None—no verified advantages are evident.
Cons
- No valid regulatory license or oversight.
- Lack of transparency regarding account details, trading conditions, and contact information.
- High and unverified leverage (up to 500:1) without breakdown by asset type.
- Absence of client fund protections—no segregation or negative balance protection.
- Numerous user reports and reviews allege scam-like behaviors, including difficulty withdrawing funds and coercion for additional deposits ().













