InvescoGBP Review
62
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About InvescoGBP
The broker operating under the name InvescoGBP offers financial services via the domain invescogbp.company and is not authorised by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. The FCA has issued a public warning indicating that the firm may be providing financial services or products in the UK without authorisation, meaning clients are not covered by the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme ().
The broker claims to be regulated by several authorities—including ASIC (Australia), DFSA (Dubai), FSCA (South Africa), CySEC (Cyprus), FCA (UK), and FSC (Belize)—but checks of official registries by the FCA and independent reviews confirm the absence of any valid licence. As a result, these regulatory claims are false and misleading ().
The broker’s site reportedly sets a minimum deposit of USD 150, offers web-based trading only, leverages up to 1:500, and advertises tight spreads of 0.1 pips. However, due to the lack of regulation, these trading conditions carry significant risk. There is no evidence of segregated client accounts, negative balance protection, compensation schemes, or transparent withdrawal terms ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- Minimum deposit amount is explicitly stated as USD 150.
- Leverage and spread figures are provided (up to 1:500 leverage, spreads from 0.1 pips), though unverifiable.
Cons
- Unauthorised by the FCA; providing financial services in the UK without licence ().
- Regulatory claims (ASIC, DFSA, FSCA, CySEC, FSC) are not verifiable in official registries ().
- No investor protection: no compensation scheme, no segregated accounts, no negative balance protection ().
- Platform is limited to a basic web interface; lacks industry-standard tools (e.g., MT4/MT5) ().
- Withdrawal terms, fees, and payment methods are unclear or undisclosed ().
- Overall, the broker is assessed as unsafe and possibly a scam in independent reviews ().
