INSURED CRYPTO TRADING Review

Updated: April 2, 2026
INSURED CRYPTO TRADING
Views90

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsDecember 20250
January 20260
February 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About INSURED CRYPTO TRADING

Insured Crypto Trading is not authorised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which issued a warning on 18 January 2024 stating that the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission and advising consumers to avoid dealing with it. The warning includes two purported addresses—“72 Broad Street, Reading, UNITED KINGDOM, RG1 2AF” and “3003 Peerless Ave, Bakersfield, California, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 93308”—plus a telephone number and email, but the FCA notes that these details may be misleading or incorrect.

The company claims to be regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, but no record exists in the CySEC register, and the FCA’s warning directly contradicts the claim of regulation in the UK. Additionally, it asserts a U.S. office presence, but lacks registration with the National Futures Association (NFA), making it non‑compliant with U.S. regulatory requirements. There is no evidence of licences, regulators, account types, platforms, minimum deposits, spreads, leverage, base currencies, or swap‑free accounts. Domain status appears to be offline, further undermining legitimacy.

Who it’s for

  • No audience—no verified regulation or protections, this platform is unsafe for any investor.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • None—no verified regulatory oversight or legal protections.

Cons

  • Unauthorised by the FCA; explicitly warned against by regulator with potential misleading contact information.
  • False claims of regulation by Credible authorities (FCA, CySEC) contradicted by official registers.
  • No registration with NFA despite U.S. office claims, meaning no legal oversight or recourse.
  • Site reportedly offline, suggesting operational or regulatory failure.

Page loaded in 474.00 ms