Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | December 2025 | 0 |
| January 2026 | 0 | |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About INSURED CRYPTO TRADING
Insured Crypto Trading is not authorised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which issued a warning on 18 January 2024 stating that the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission and advising consumers to avoid dealing with it. The warning includes two purported addresses—“72 Broad Street, Reading, UNITED KINGDOM, RG1 2AF” and “3003 Peerless Ave, Bakersfield, California, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 93308”—plus a telephone number and email, but the FCA notes that these details may be misleading or incorrect.
The company claims to be regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, but no record exists in the CySEC register, and the FCA’s warning directly contradicts the claim of regulation in the UK. Additionally, it asserts a U.S. office presence, but lacks registration with the National Futures Association (NFA), making it non‑compliant with U.S. regulatory requirements. There is no evidence of licences, regulators, account types, platforms, minimum deposits, spreads, leverage, base currencies, or swap‑free accounts. Domain status appears to be offline, further undermining legitimacy.
Who it’s for
- No audience—no verified regulation or protections, this platform is unsafe for any investor.
Pros and cons
Pros
- None—no verified regulatory oversight or legal protections.
Cons
- Unauthorised by the FCA; explicitly warned against by regulator with potential misleading contact information.
- False claims of regulation by Credible authorities (FCA, CySEC) contradicted by official registers.
- No registration with NFA despite U.S. office claims, meaning no legal oversight or recourse.
- Site reportedly offline, suggesting operational or regulatory failure.













