GT Markets Review

Updated: April 10, 2026
GT Markets
Views140

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsDecember 20250
January 20260
February 20260
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-
Top keywordstrading at gt180 ◦ $0

About GT Markets

GT Markets operates under the name Pure M Global Ltd, incorporated in Vanuatu and claims regulation by the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission under firm reference number 14801. However, confirmation indicates that it is registered but not authorized as a financial dealer, thus lacking genuine regulatory oversight despite VFSC listings.

Account offerings include Standard and VIP account types. The Standard account (MT4/MT5) has a minimum deposit between €/$100–€/$1 000, spreads from 0.3 pips, commission €6 per round lot, and maximum leverage up to 1:400. The VIP account (MT5 only) requires €/$5 000, offers spreads from 0.1 pips, commission €4.5 per round lot, and the same maximum leverage of 1:400.

Platforms supported include MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 (desktop, web, mobile). Asset classes cover 58 FX pairs, metals (up to 6 in MT5), 3 energy products, 13 indices, approximately 300 stocks (MT5), and cryptocurrencies (1 in MT4, 4 in MT5). Liquidity is provided via STP with DMA and a pool of 21 liquidity providers. Client funds are held in segregated accounts at “top-tier banks” through Etana Custody, with claims that GT Markets does not use client funds for operations.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Access to MT4 and MT5 trading platforms across multiple devices
  • Wide range of instruments: FX, metals, energy, indices, stocks, and crypto
  • High leverage up to 1:400
  • Use of segregated accounts and Etana Custody for fund storage

Cons

  • Not authorized as a financial dealer by VFSC despite claiming regulation
  • No investor protection schemes, negative balance protection, or oversight from top-tier regulators
  • Withdrawal transparency and processing details are not clearly disclosed

Page loaded in 470.00 ms