GLB Markets Review
54
Review
Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | July 2025 | 0 |
| August 2025 | 0 | |
| September 2025 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About GLB Markets
GLB Markets states that it is licensed and regulated by the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority (AOFA), with license number L15744/GIH, and incorporated as an International Business Company (IBC) under the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of Seychelles ().
The broker offers trading in forex, indices, commodities, futures, options, shares, and other CFDs, with leverage up to 1:400, negative balance protection, commission-free trading, spreads as the only trading cost, and access via proprietary web and mobile platforms (X‑web and X‑mobile) (). A risk disclosure notes that products are OTC, margin and leverage involve high risk, that overnight swap rates apply, and that trading involves market counterparty risk ().
No regulatory records have been found confirming valid forex or CFD licenses with the Seychelles FSA or the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), despite GLB Markets’ claims; independent sources list the broker as unregulated and classify it as a scam (), and watchdog platforms confirm the absence of verified regulation (), and assign a low trust score (10/100) with multiple red flags noted ().
Pros and cons
Pros
- Negative balance protection is stated in the risk disclosure ().
- Wide asset classes offered (forex, CFDs on commodities, indices, futures, options, shares) ().
Cons
- No verified regulation or license under the FSA Seychelles or FCA, despite the broker’s claims ()– ().
- Listed as unregulated and high-risk, with scam classification on multiple independent platforms (); (); ().
- Lack of transparency regarding management, licensing status, client fund protection, segregated accounts, or corporate structure beyond vague statements (); independent reviewers cite opacity as a major concern ().
