Fast Facts
Contact Info and Support
Traffic information
| Category | Metrics | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | Global Rank | - |
| Country Code | - | |
| Country Rank | - | |
| Category Rank | - | |
| Engagement metrics | Visits | 0 |
| Bounce Rate | 0 | |
| Pageviews per Visit | 0 | |
| Avg. Visit Duration | 0 | |
| Estimated monthly visits | December 2025 | 0 |
| January 2026 | 0 | |
| February 2026 | 0 | |
| Traffic sources | Social | - |
| Paid Referrals | - | |
| - | ||
| Referrals | - | |
| Search | - | |
| Direct | - |
About Desmond Capital Ltd
Desmond Capital Ltd operates via the website . The company is unregulated and does not hold any authorization from recognized financial authorities. On 13 September 2023, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority issued a warning that Desmond Capital Ltd was providing financial services or products in the UK without authorization (). This means that clients would not have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme ().
Multiple independent reviews confirm that Desmond Capital Ltd lacks legitimate regulation—despite claims to the contrary, no valid licenses were found with the FCA, NFA, ASIC, FSA or other major regulators (). Reports also highlight significant transparency concerns, inconsistent or fake addresses (e.g. 272 Watford Road, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK and 2114 Pemaco Road, Merrick, NY, USA), and widespread allegations of scam activity ().
Some sources cite specific trading conditions: an alleged minimum deposit of $250, maximum leverage up to 1:200, average spreads around 2 pips, and availability of the MetaTrader 5 platform (). However, these terms are unverified by official regulatory filings and remain contested given the broker’s unregulated status and operational opacity.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Claims to offer MT5 trading platform and standard entry-level terms (e.g. $250 deposit, 1:200 leverage, ~2 pips spread) ().
Cons
- No regulatory authorization; explicit FCA warning for unauthorised services in the UK ().
- Absence of investor protections—no access to FSCS or ombudsman; funds not safeguarded ().
- Allegations of scam, fake offices, and withdrawal issues reported across multiple review platforms ().













