Deltascrypto Review

Updated: March 20, 2026
Deltascrypto
Views66

Fast Facts

Contact Info and Support

Traffic information

CategoryMetricsMeaning
RatingsGlobal Rank-
Country Code-
Country Rank-
Category Rank-
Engagement metricsVisits0
Bounce Rate0
Pageviews per Visit0
Avg. Visit Duration0
Estimated monthly visitsOctober 20250
November 20250
December 20250
Traffic sourcesSocial-
Paid Referrals-
Mail-
Referrals-
Search-
Direct-

About Deltascrypto

Deltascrypto is identified by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as a clone of an FCA‑authorised firm, using the website without permission or connection to the genuine firm Delta (UK) Investment Limited (FRN 521352) ().

The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinspektionen) issued an investor alert on 15 June 2023 stating that Deltascrypto is not authorised to conduct securities or financial services in Sweden and recognized no cross‑border notification or regulatory basis for its operations ().

Multiple reviews and assessments characterize Deltascrypto as unregulated and exhibiting typical scam features: it displays unspecified license numbers without naming any regulator, lacks transparency regarding corporate structure or jurisdiction, offers unusually high leverage, imposes restrictive and unclear withdrawal terms, and is flagged for negative customer experiences and operational opacity ().

Consumer feedback includes reports of frozen accounts, refusal to allow withdrawals, and deceptive behavior, with low trust scores and negative reviews on platforms such as Sitejabber ().

Pros and cons

Pros

  • The website holds a valid SSL certificate, indicating encrypted communications ().

Cons

  • Operates as a clone of an FCA‑authorised firm without any genuine regulation ().
  • Unauthorised by Swedish regulator FI for securities or financial services ().
  • Presents misleading licensing statements without regulator attribution ().
  • Uses opaque terms, high leverage, and introduces withdrawal obstacles — typical of scam operations ().
  • Reports of frozen funds, denial of withdrawals, and unresponsive customer support contribute to its negative reputation ().

Page loaded in 407.00 ms